[ SOCIAL AND PASTORAL BULLETIN No. 136 / Feb. 15 .2007 ] | ||
|
||
Abe Keita (Franciscan priest) |
|
||
The bill on the Fundamental Law of Education was passed by the Diet, last
December. Citizens' groups conducted demonstrations at the time of the
legislation passed by the Diet, concerned about the lack of proper news
coverage in the reporting of mass media. About 4,000 people, bringing candles,
lined up and enclosed the National Diet last December, at the time of the
discussions on the bill, while others resorted to hunger strike and sit-down
tactics.
During the month of November I received e-mails through a network inviting
me to participate in the demonstrations and I went there a few times. Many
more citizens than expected participated in the demonstrations at Hibiya
Park and Nagatacho. The participants belonged to several organizations,
like lawyers' groups, teachers and trade unionists.
The public appeals were also quite different. There were participants opposing
the bill on education based on their past experiences in the pre-war education
system, or educators who could not agree on a legislation that prepares
people to go to war. Such variety of opinions found expression in public
enthusiastic appeals spontaneously transmitted to all present there.
Nevertheless, I noticed that the average age of the participants was high.
Compared to the student movements of the '60s and '70s, the participation
of people of the young generations was low. In other words, the presence
of those that belong to the ordinary mass of people was conspicuous.
The participation of the generations that will be influenced by the new
Fundamental Law of Education and of university students was practically
none. Time wise, the public gatherings were scheduled between 5 and 6:00pm
and thus quite convenient for ordinary people, nevertheless young people
were absent.
I realized that it was not just the result of lack of interest or of awareness
but of something more basic. In other words, I felt that maybe the problem
was that information was not rightly transmitted to the youth, in a way
they could understand how important the problem was. When I passed by through
Shibuya in my way back, the town was full of young people. If just a small
part of the youth there attended the demonstrations, the situation could
have changed, I thought.
|
Right after the education bill was passed at the Diet, I received through
networks many notifications on gatherings and study groups, concerning
the Fundamental Law of Education and Article 9 of the Constitution and
I felt the needed of studying thoroughly the revised legislation.
For instance, article 9 of the Fundamental Law of Education speaking about
religious education says: "The attitude of religious tolerance and
the position of religion in the social life shall be valued in education."
But according to the revision of the Law it reads like: "The attitude
of religious tolerance and the general program regarding religion, as well
as the position of religion in social life shall be valued in education."
Thus, there is danger that National Shinto could be introduced as part
of a general program regarding religion. Nevertheless, since in article
2 of the revised law it says that, "public schools shall refrain from
religious education or the activities for specified religion," teachers
can not impose National Shinto on the students, but only teach a right
understanding of religion. In this way, if we are careful to find out the
contents legislation allows, we can not affirm that there are no ways open
for peace education.
Reflecting on my experience getting involved in the movements, regarding
the revision of legislation on educational matters, I felt the importance
of informing the next generation about the issues that are included in
the revision of the Law.
|
|
===== Copyright ®1997-2007 Jesuit Social Center All Rights Reserved
=====
|