Juan Masia, SJ (Sophia University)
|
||||
One of the readers of this column has sent a postcard asking about sex
selection. Obviously, this is a subject which is very much related to the
main theme I have been dealing with under the title of "seimei no
shouhinka."
There are two points to be considered: first, whether sex selection itself
is morally wrong; secondly, whether the methods used are morally wrong.
First of all, taking into account that both sexes have equal human dignity
and have the right to receive an equal treatment, we should reject sex
selection, while leaving room for some exceptional cases, for instance,
therapeutic reasons. Secondly, with regard to the methods been used, we
should reject specially abortion as a method of sex selection.
There has been a lot of talk in the mass media recently about "pre-implantation
genetic diagnosis" as a method of sex selection. Embryos obtained
by, in vitro fertilization, are tested in order to check for genetic diseases.
Objections against this method have been raised, not only from the viewpoint
of the discrimination between the sexes, but also from the viewpoint of
discrimination of genetically disabled persons.
The technology called "sperm sorting" has become a more common
method of sex selection. X and Y spermatozoon are sorted in order to obtain
an embryo of the desired sex.
At the beginning, this technology was used for therapeutic reasons. For
instance, hemophilia is more common in boys than in girls. A couple with
a medical record of this illness might like to make sure to have a girl
instead of a boy. At that time, the "Glover Report" to the European
Commission of Bioethics said: "Clinics should not be permitted to
offer sex selection of children, except on medical grounds" (J. Glover et al., Ethics of the New Reproductive Technologies: The Glover
Report to the European Commission, Northern Illinois University Press, 1989).
|
But, unfortunately, this method of sex selection is also been used for
non medical reasons, under the euphemism of "finding a balance between
boys and girls within the family."
It goes without saying that the most objectionable method of sex selection
from the viewpoint of morality is abortion. Although there is not so much
talk about it, in fact abortion is been used as a method of sex selection.
I think we have here a clear example of "seimei no shouhinka,"
namely, dealing with life as a mere commodity. If the parents decide to
abort a fetus for the reason that it is not of the desired sex, the human
dignity of the unborn life is negated and the most basic relationships
within the family are destroyed. But also, besides that, the fact that
abortion becomes a routine as a method of sex selection shows a basic weakness
of our culture, which is becoming more and more inclined to deal with life
as a commodity.
Apart from the general issue of the morality of abortion, I think it is
important to consider the problem of discrimination. In some cases, the
desire of the prospective parents to undertake the procedure of sex selection
is an expression of sex prejudice, mostly against women.
|
|||
===== Copyright ®1997-2007 Jesuit Social Center All Rights Reserved =====
|